sexta-feira, agosto 21, 2015

21 Toolkits, Whitepapers, and Best Practices for Open Innovation

21 Toolkits, Whitepapers, and Best Practices for Open Innovation

21 Toolkits, Whitepapers, and Best Practices for Open Innovation

Open Innovation Whitepapers, Toolkits, And Best Practices. Photo By: Open Source Way https://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourceway/

The ultimate resource list for change makers and innovators. If you are looking for open innovation toolkits, open innovation whitepapers, and open innovation best practices, you have come to the right place. We have compiled this list of toolkits, whitepapers, and best practices to help you find in depth information about open innovation. If you have a great whitepaper, toolkit, or article to add to the list- let us know in the comments!

Toolkits

100 Open Innovation Toolkit - A variety of different open innovation tools to help you in every stage of the innovation process!

100% Open Innovation Toolkit For Charities - All the great tools in the open innovation toolkit, specifically geared towards charities. In the form of a handy slideshare presentation.

Accelerate Open Innovation Toolkit - A comprehensive guide through the open innovation process, designed for the EU.

A Practical Guide To Open Innovation - Specifically geared towards life sciences organisations, this open innovation guide covers everything from methodology to practical tips.

Guidelines For Collecting And Interpreting Innovation Data - A guide on interpreting data and using it to fuel your projects and initiatives.

Increasing Innovative Capacity - Is your organisation ready to benefit from open innovation? This workbook walks you through the basics of open innovation and helps you decide if your organisation is ready to embark on the road of creative innovation.

Whitepapers

Open Innovation 2.0: A New Paradigm - Exploring new methods in open innovation and how innovators and change makers can best make an impact.

Embrace Failure To Build A Stronger Innovation Culture - Open innovation industry thought leader and business strategist, Stefan Lindegaard, shares his insights from a recent survey and reviews case studies in which he looked at how global innovation teams deal with failure and embrace the concept of smart-failing.

Increase Your Innovation ROI With Internal Collaboration - This open innovation whitepaper outlines the steps that companies need to take to accelerate internal collaboration to drive their business and to find solutions to problems that matter most.

Creating An Innovation Culture - An innovative culture is key to outperforming your competitors. Having the appropriate mindset and behaviors engrained in the organization is especially essential for companies pursuing open innovation. This open innovation whitepaper describes how an innovative culture operates and provides advice on how to move toward creating such a culture in your company.

Adding Value To Your Innovation Initiative With Challenges - This whitepaper explores the use of prize-based challenges to accelerate innovation outcomes and improve business performance through integration to existing enterprise business processes, and specifically, the ubiquitous Stage-Gate process.

Harnessing The Global Talent Pool To Accelerate Innovation - This open innovation whitepaper explores the intersection of talent management and open innovation strategies. The paper dives into why having an external talent strategy is becoming increasingly important and how it can help your company accelerate innovation, shows how leading organizations manage their open innovation and crowdsourcing efforts (including case study examples of companies like P&G), and provides proven strategies and steps to take for attracting talent to your organization's innovation efforts.

Innovate Or Die - A discussion about removing barriers to open innovation. Who is abe to innovate and how can we extend the culture beyond experts.

Open Innovation Ted Talk - Charles Leadbeater discusses how the era of open innovation isn't just for businesses anymore. New tools and paradigms are allowing everyone to use open innovation for good.

Best Practices

Best Practicies For Open Innovation - A 2013 US study about the best practices in open innovation. By evaluating and measuring results from various case studies, the authors of this report share their recommendations on getting the most out of open innovation.

Good Practices In Open Innovation - An overview of the tools and processes that help organisations innovate.

Enhancing Idea Generation Through Collaboration - A research study that includes case studies to outline 11 best practices in open innovation.

Open Innovation Best Practices By Hyve - A short video outlining best practices in open innovation and co-creation.

4 Innovation Best Practices By Award Winners - IdeaScale's 5 innovation award winners share their best tips and advice for open innovation.

12 Good Practices In Open Innovation - From the Hype Innovation blog, Oana Maria shares 12 best practices in open innovation for the year to come.

9 Innovation Concepts & Methodologies to Embrace, Consider or Rethink - Open innovation is a constantly changing model. How can we best adapt our practices by learning from research, experience, and new technology.

Opinet Open Innovation Best Practice Guide - Best practices in open innovation with some great case studies of innovative companies.

Free Social Innovation Guide

If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by Email or RSS

comments powered by



Paul Smith 
QALA LATAM Partners
Associado ao Grupo Bozano
+55 21 98118-0300
Typos compliments of my iPad

Top 4 Crowdfunding Mistakes on Social Media

Top 4 Crowdfunding Mistakes on Social Media

Top 4 Crowdfunding Mistakes on Social Media

Social media and crowdfunding go together like a horse and carriage yet as much as the horsepower of social media has sent many crowdfunding campaigns viral and straight into the crowdfunding hall of fame; if not done right – social media will at best ignore you.

Since the rise of social media tools like Crowd Builder have made it so much easier to connect with people who are into crowdfunding, it seems like some folks are forgetting that there are real people behind those Twitter handles and Facebook names, each with their own wants and needs and no desire to be spammed.

social-capital-header

Before there was social media, most people actually met face to face in pubs, at gatherings, conferences and other venues, to do what now largely happens on social media. I think you'd agree that just because there is a now a new venue doesn't mean the rules of interaction have changed. No one in their right mind would walk up to a complete stranger in a public space asking them to cold turkey to support their crowdfunding campaign. Ludicrous right? Befriending that stranger first, showing interest in what they do and building a connection before delivering your pitch is what seems the most normal thing to do, at least in the offline world. Yet online, maybe at times under the pressure of the crowdfunding clock ticking and the false sense of anonymity of being behind a keyboard, many forget that the same rules that apply in the real world also apply online.

Here are the most common mistakes I have observed people make on social media, in no particular order since each one has the potential to kill your efforts if ignored.

  • Fail to Build a Strong Enough Social Network Before Launch
    There are no people on social media waiting for the launch of your campaign. There, I've said it. Please don't kill the messenger and while tools like Crowd Builder can help you to quickly and effortlessly identify crowdfunding supporters, it is still up to you to connect, build a relationship with each individual by favoriting and retweeting some of their tweets over the course of the months and weeks building up to your campaign. Social media is all about sharing, you build networks by connecting with people who could be interested in your campaign but rather than simply delivering your pitch, you scratch their back for a while by favoriting, retweeting, sharing and commenting on what they post.

    Sorry, there are no short cuts as a solid following on social media cannot be built in a couple of weeks. If you're just starting out on Twitter, it will take 4-6 months to build an audience that can be activated for your campaign once you're ready to launch. When do you know if your social media following is big enough and you're ready to launch? You can use Krowdster's Social Capital Gauge to measure the size of your Twitter and Facebook following and find out how much other campaigns with similar social reach have raised.

  • Connect With the Wrong People on Social Media
    How does one connect with the "right crowd" on social media? Who are the people you want to follow you and ultimately support you? Who are those most likely to become your backers? This is a topic of much confusion, frustration and misled efforts. Does it work to go on Twitter and search for "crowdfunding" to find people who are likely to support your campaign because Twitter returns them in their search results? No. Why not? Simply because Twitter returns search results based on keywords in handle, name, bio and such. This means you'll get the same search results, showing the same crowdfunding platforms, consultants and ancillary service providers who everyone else also goes after.

    Crowdfunding professionals are very unlikely to support any crowdfunding campaign simply because that's not what they do because they get flooded with hundreds of these requests per week. For example, if your campaign is about raising money for developing a 3D printer that will blow everything else out of the water, you'd start building a Twitter account, Facebook account and maybe a Tumblr account around the topic and start following the influencers in that space. Google has a free Keyword Planner that will allow you to find keywords around 3D printing that you can use to search. You can use these keywords to search Twitter, Facebook and Crowd Builder to get lists of users in your space, people interested in 3D printing.

  • Ask for Sharing or Money Right Away
    Absolutely nothing is worse than asking a stranger (on social media) to either share your campaign or make a donation right away. Think about how you'd react to a pitch from someone you've never heard of and you'll agree. There is no short cut to crowdfunding success on social media without putting in the time and effort. These are relationships that need to be built way ahead of the time you are planning to cash in on them. Social media does make this process faster and easier than real life and even if you already have a decent social media following, do not ask them for money right away either.

    Remember, social media is all about sharing, and sharing your campaign preview and asking your network for feedback will yield invaluable feedback. Most crowdfunding platforms let you share a preview link with your supporters and that's an excellent way of gauging your audience's interest way before you even ask their financial support.Because this is a mistake I see time and time again: Do not ask for shareing or financially contribution to your campaign right away, build a relationship first as described above to avoid shooting yourself in the foot.

  • Underutilize Your Social Networks
    Every second, on average, around 6,000 tweets are tweeted on Twitter according to internetlivestats.com which means Twitter is a never ending waterfall of tweets. If your audience isn't online right when you tweet, they are very likely to miss it as your tweet gets pushed down their timeline. This means in order to reach all of your audience on Twitter you have to tweet several times per day, every day. On Twitter more really is more, don't feel like you'll be annoying your audience because you tweet 6-8 times a day, spreading your message across 24hrs, you'll be reaching a maximum percentage of your audience.

    For Facebook I recommend posting no more than once every 1-3 days depending on the size of your audience, post more or less frequently. Key on Facebook and Twitter to keep messages fresh, report on latest campaign goals and stretch goals.If you're afraid to upset your social network by asking them for support, you are either thinking about it wrong or your idea isn't good enough. If you feel ashamed to ask for money, don't do it. Crowdfunding is not about asking money, it is about creating momentum and support for a great idea or cause. If you think your idea is not quite ready or deep inside you feel it is wishful thinking – don't do it. Otherwise give your campaign the time it takes to build a network of supporters, then own it, go 100% in, make updates fun and entertaining. Don't ask for money, invite them to be part of the next big thing and make it worth their while to not only connect with you on social media but also to support and share you idea.

The bottom is that in this day and age, crowdfunding is no longer a novelty, it is a truly crowded space out there and in order to stand out and get support you have to get your social media game on.




Paul Smith 
QALA LATAM Partners
Associado ao Grupo Bozano
+55 21 98118-0300
Typos compliments of my iPad

The Top 5 Industries for Disruptive Growth in 2015 (Infographic) | Inc.com

The Top 5 Industries for Disruptive Growth in 2015 (Infographic) | Inc.com

The Top 5 Industries for Disruptive Growth in 2015 (Infographic)

Here are the top five sectors Inc. 500 CEOs say are ripe for disruption:

Health Care

It's hard not to see the potential. Americans spent $2.9 trillion on health care in 2013; how many people do you know who are happy with what they get for their portion of that figure? Still, two huge challenges loom: giant, well-funded incumbents, and reams of regulation.

Financial Services, Banking

Payment startups Stripe and Square boast 10-digit valuations. Late last year, Apple announced Apple Pay, and alternative lender Lending Club had a successful IPO. But many sense big opportunities lurking herein (see "Fintech Finally Lifts Off"). As they say, it's where the money is.

Energy

A sector that's long attracted serious money: In the past decade, VCs plowed billions into the green-tech startups that take on portions of the fossil-fuel ecosystem. Disappointing results led many to pull back on such investments, but Inc. 500 CEOs still sense huge potential.

Media, Cable, Broadcasting

The ongoing digitization of media experiences has led to significant change and challenges for newspapers, radio, and -- yes -- magazines, while television's fortunes remained relatively stable. But one glimpse at your kids' smartphone-centric ways lets you know more change is coming.

Automotive

Bulls point to Tesla; bears point to Fisker Automotive, which went bankrupt in 2013. But deep-pocketed players in Silicon Valley (like Google and Uber) and Detroit are making bets on self-driving cars. Such shakeups of this notoriously staid industry will breed new prospects for founder




Paul Smith 
QALA LATAM Partners
Associado ao Grupo Bozano
+55 21 98118-0300
Typos compliments of my iPad

Why Fintech Is One of the Most Promising Industries of 2015 | Inc.com

Why Fintech Is One of the Most Promising Industries of 2015 | Inc.com

Why Fintech Is One of the Most Promising Industries of 2015

It's been about two decades since a financial company really changed the world. Inc. 500 entrepreneurs are leading a pack of disrupters, raised in the shadow of PayPal, who will change your business relationship to money forever.

Bill Clerico is an unassuming bachelor. Slight, friendly, and coder-pale, he doesn't appear to be the sort who'd revel in the ritual humiliations of a TV dating show. But for 44 minutes in 2011, you could find Clerico on Bravo, submitting his looks ("a little, nerdy redhead"), his three-year-old startup ("Nobody cares about a software company"), and his makeout game ("Do you really know how to kiss?") to some derision on The Millionaire Matchmaker. "I was single then, and figured I would mortgage a little personal dignity for awareness," Clerico says. "Did not find love."

That was only his latest effort to get people to notice his payments software company, WePay. He'd tried recruiting financial startup royalty, but a request to meet with PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel went nowhere. Then WePay hijacked some publicity at a PayPal developer conference, dropping a 600-pound block of ice--with dollar bills encased within and a message about PayPal "freezing your accounts"--at the entrance. Awkwardly flirting on reality TV was just the next step in Clerico's campaign to make his payments-processing company sound more attractive than, well, a payments-processing company.

"It wasn't an interesting space to be in when we got started," Clerico recalls. "The view was that there are just such strong monopolies there in terms of the existing banks... and no one's built a successful payments company since PayPal."

It sure is interesting today. Four years later, Clerico and WePay co-founder Rich Aberman can put the stunts behind them. With $24.9 million in revenue last year--up 4,354.5 percent from 2011--WePay (No. 62 on this year's Inc. 500 list of America's fastest-growing private companies) is profitable, and flush with a total of $75 million in investor cash. The Redwood City, California, company is worth $220 million, according to PitchBook.

WePay is also focused on a quickly evolving market niche. All those credit card donations that you've been making on crowdfunding sites such as GoFundMe or CrowdRise need to be processed. WePay handles that particular chore better than most. That makes the company poised to grow at the same rapid pace as its clients. Clerico says it's on track to double or maybe even triple the business this year.

WePay is one of many finance-oriented startups dominating the rankings: From the financial services category alone, four are in the top 20 and 27 on the list overall, with a combined $850.7 million in 2014 revenue. Those companies are among the first to notice a huge opportunity to reinvent the financial services sector. That industry is currently the second-biggest target for disruption, after health care, according to a survey of this year's Inc. 500 CEOs (see "Where the Big Opportunities Live").

Long seen as a highly technical, highly regulated industry dominated by giant banks that resist disruption--other than the occasional global meltdown--finance is now riding an entrepreneurial wave. Demand for upstarts' services is strong, piqued by widespread frustration with big banks; supply is growing, fueled in part by financial types itching to do something other than toil inside those same megacorporations. ("I don't think anyone enjoys being an investment banker," chuckles Clerico, who did time at Goldman Sachs and Jefferies.) And low interest rates have made capital, the raw material for many money-related startups, cheap and plentiful.

Perhaps most important, customers have embraced the idea, thanks to the rise of the mobile, on-demand economy. "The world is far more connected today than it was 15 or 20 years ago. The tools that are available--cheap storage, cheap computing, and wonderful analytics--have changed, the regulatory environment has changed, and people are way more comfortable managing their money and business online," says Pat Grady, a partner at Sequoia Capital. His VC firm often makes bets in this world, with investments from PayPal to Square to Prosper (No. 86)--and Grady sees vast opportunities ahead. "If you want to dream a little, the entire financial system could be remade with companies we're seeing today," he says.

"We're just at the beginning of this renaissance in alternative lending--and I look forward to the day it's not called alternative." Rob Frohwein, Kabbage

And what a big, fat target they have to remake. Goldman Sachs estimates that upstarts could steal up to $4.7 trillion in annual revenue, and $470 billion in profit, from established financial services companies. Even a fraction of a point of market share represents significant business, so investors are falling all over themselves to back new entrants. Or to get in themselves: Goldman is so impressed with fintech, it is launching its own online lending operation. Venture capitalists invested $23.5 billion globally in fintech in the past two years, according to estimates by Santander, Oliver Wyman, and Anthemis Group: "Of this investment, 27% has been in consumer lending, 23% in payments and 16% in business lending," the researchers wrote in a recent report, adding: "Fintechs have two unique selling points: better use of data and frictionless customer experience."

In some respects fintech is being revolutionized by entrepreneurs for entrepreneurs. You may get your next business loan from Lending Club, OnDeck, or Kabbage, instead of a it-takes-forever bank; rather than scrambling to interest venture capital firms or other traditional investors, you can now look to Kickstarter, Indie­gogo, or CircleUp. Your company's transactions could be processed with fewer headaches by Square, Stripe, or WePay. And you can manage your money automatically at Betterment or Wealthfront and not pay for investment advice that may or may not outperform the market. You can even start replacing money itself using Coinbase, Circle, and other digital-currency options.

In the vision of fintech entrepreneurs such as Rob Frohwein, CEO of small-business lending platform Kabbage (No. 36), online lending "shouldn't be the place you go after others turn you down. It should be the first place you look when you're looking to grow." A technology lawyer, Frohwein started Atlanta-based Kabbage in 2009 with financial industry veteran Kathryn Petralia and data and security entrepreneur Marc Gorlin. The founders noticed so much more data becoming available online, they figured they could use it to underwrite loans to small businesses that couldn't otherwise get credit--and to do so almost within minutes, not the 24 hours or so entrepreneurs now spend, on average, applying for bank loans. Five years later, Kabbage has grown to an annual revenue of $40.2 million--up 6,722.4 percent over three years. "We're really just at the beginning of this renaissance period in alternative lending," says Frohwein. "And I look forward to the day when it's not called alternative."

That day is getting closer. At the end of last year, online marketplace Lending Club and small-business lender OnDeck Capital both went public, IPOs that almost all founders, investors, and analysts point to as a validation of what fintech entrepreneurs can achieve--and the impact they are already having.

Bill Clerico (left) and Rich Aberman were college roommates who turned the problem of small cash payments into a large business, WePay.

Just ask WePay. It began as a company solving the small problem of moving small amounts of money around. Suppose you wanted to make it easier for your buddies to pool money to book ski trips: That was the issue Clerico set out to solve with Aberman, his freshman roommate at Boston College in 2003. After graduation, Aberman headed for law school at New York University and Clerico into investment banking, where he started working with startup CEOs. Those meetings gave him the entrepreneurial bug--and the job (and some credit cards) gave him enough money to seed-fund WePay. In 2008, the friends launched their business.

WePay is a different company now. In late 2013, the founders made a risky bet on the future of crowdfunding--and shut down WePay's original, group-payments business, even though that segment accounted for 40 percent of revenue. Instead, WePay zeroed in on behind-the-scenes payments processing, which started off as a small side business but had quickly outpaced the consumer side's growth. When you donate to a friend's hospital bills on GoFundMe, or hire a babysitter on Care.com, WePay is collecting money from your credit card and getting it to the recipient, taking its fee (a competitive 2.9 percent of the total, plus 30 cents) along the way.

That turned out to be an immensely savvy bet. Crowdfunding payments have exploded, going from $3.9 billion in 2013 to $9.5 billion in 2014, according to consulting firm Massolution--which predicts that that number will nearly double again this year. What online shopping did for PayPal, the rise of the GoFundMe economy seems to be doing for WePay.

--

"I'm sweating from excitement." Blame the early- summer Manhattan humidity, blame the packed hipster hotel lobby, blame his rapid consumption of two espresso drinks, but Max Levchin blames the topic: payments processing.

It's been more than an hour, and the PayPal co-founder has barely stopped for breath. While Thiel may once have been reluctant to meet with some would-be PayPal successors, Levchin is tirelessly excited about the new financial innovators. WePay's one of them--he's an investor. "Peter and I had very opposite reactions to the PayPal experience," Levchin says, recalling a conversation right after both men had left. Thiel told him, " 'I'm exhausted and never want to touch this industry again.' And I said, 'I kind of miss it already.' "

Thiel's since regained his enthusiasm--he's an investor in Stripe, a larger competitor to WePay, as is Levchin. But his apparent earlier wariness about the sector reflects its underwhelming track record. In the nearly two decades between PayPal's launch and Lending Club's 2014 IPO, nobody else has fully reinvented the financial world in the U.S.

Now Levchin is among those betting that this new crop of startups, his own included, can reorder the money universe--and make it more transparent and consumer-friendly in the process. His Affirm, launched in 2013, has big ambitions: "We ultimately see ourselves as a full-service bank," he says.

It's got quite a way to go. Affirm first targeted consumer lending, and this year branched into student loans for coders. Its first product tries to supplant the high-interest-rate credit cards hawked by retailers with online installment loans, which customers can apply for as they shop. Levchin admits that he hasn't figured out the entire road map--especially how to navigate banking's heavy regulatory burden. "It'll definitely take a while to get there," he says. "I would lie if I said that I know exactly how we get FDIC this and SEC that."

Meanwhile, Levchin is betting on a number of companies that could transform the ecosystem, including WePay. But he's also excited about the fintech arrival of an 800-pound gorilla--or maybe cephalopod--from a decidedly less entrepreneurial background. "Sharing the spotlight with Goldman Sachs is not a bad thing," he says. "They're attracting more attention, and more investor money, to the industry." And from a potential competitive standpoint, "nobody's in more danger of getting smacked around by the regulators than the vampire squid."

"If you want to dream a little, the entire financial system could be remade with these companies."Pat Grady, Sequoia

Still, the fintech world is signposted with startups that were swallowed by bigger fish (Mint, Venmo, Braintree) or sank: personal finance manager Wesabe, the online bank PerkStreet, and Bitcoin exchange BitInstant are a few of the damned. The latter, especially, ran afoul of regulators: BitInstant was an early leader in the nascent digital currency market, but co-founder Charlie Shrem is currently serving two years in prison on federal charges of money laundering. More fintech scrutiny is coming: The Treasury Department recently launched a study of online lending practices.

"The one thing I'm really worried about would be bad actors polluting the pool, and undermining investor confidence in what we're all doing," says Prosper CEO Aaron Vermut. He should know; he's spent the past two years helping his company claw back from regulator-triggered near-death. Prosper, founded 10 years ago by Chris Larsen and John Witchel, was the first U.S. online lending marketplace, before even Lending Club. But in 2008, when the Securities and Exchange Commission decided that Prosper and Lending Club were selling securities rather than just providing loans, one handled the scrutiny better than the other. Lending Club quickly suspended its business to address the SEC's concerns, and restarted on better terms with regulators; Prosper was slower to react, and eventually got hit with a cease-and-desist order. Larsen left in 2012, and by early 2013, Prosper had an interim CEO, a recently failed round of financing, a fractious board of directors, and a class-action lawsuit related to the company's securities sales.

"Wow, that messed-up thing sounds like something we could really sink our teeth into," Vermut recalls thinking. He and his father, Stephan, along with partner Ron Suber, had just sold their prime brokerage business to Wells Fargo, and were itching for a new project. They invested $3 million, got a Sequoia-led group of investors on board for another $17 million, and started a turnaround.

This spring, Prosper closed on a $165 million round, valuing the company at nearly $2 billion. Prosper is now living up to its name: Revenue totaled $81.3 million in 2014--up 3,618.1 percent over three years--and Vermut in June predicted that Prosper would "get close to $200 million" this year. "We came in with the understanding that we were either going to make it a really big success or we were going to break it," Vermut says. "And we came pretty close a couple of times--but I can honestly say now it's bigger than we ever thought it was going to get."

WePay also has bigger on its mind; a recent $40 million finance round will help it expand to Australia, the United Kingdom, and, eventually, the rest of Western Europe. "We serve some big, global crowdfunding sites and marketplace platforms, and we want to help them move money all over the world," Clerico says.

His visions of world payments-processing domination still elicit some teasing, although it's not on cable these days--or at the expense of his romantic misadventures. Clerico is now "happily engaged to someone I did not meet on the show," a Boston College classmate and Facebook recruiter he met at their five-year college reunion.

But after abandoning WePay's initial business, and its original goal of simplifying his ski trips, Clerico has been reduced to using boring old spreadsheets and bank transfers to keep track of his group's skiing expenses. His buddies "make fun of me now, because WePay no longer does group payments," he says. "I always get an email complaining, 'Oh, if only there was an easy way to collect the money.'"

With WePay looking to bring in up to $75 million in business this year, it appears he's found one. 


Perkstreet

Boom and Bust
Customers loved this online bank, and its generous rewards--which cost too much to sustain. It closed in 2013.

OnDeck
Second Stage
The small-business lender went public in 2014, validating a market for startups that provide high-priced but speedy credit to entrepreneurs.

BitInstant
Flame-Out
This early Bitcoin startup was backed by the Winklevoss twins but came under regulatory scrutiny and shuttered in 2013. Its co-founder is now in prison for money laundering.

Coinbase
Charting New Territory
One of the most successful Bitcoin- related startups, this virtual currency exchange is backed by both VCs and banks.

Square
Escape Velocity
The mobile payments company changed the way small businesses accept payments, but has also struggled with product setbacks and a much-rumored IPO.

WePay
New Trajectory
Launched as a consumer payments company, in 2013 WePay turned to processing payments for crowdfunding sites--and it has soared ever since.

Prosper
Late Recovery
One of the earliest online lending innovators, it faltered under regulatory scrutiny but started a comeback in 2013, and is now worth $1.9 billion.

Betterment
Autopilot
This "robo-adviser" is jockeying with Wealthfront, among others, to build a cheaper, more tech-reliant type of wealth-management firm.

Wesabe
Into Thin Air
A precursor to Mint.com, this personal-finance manager launched in 2006 but lost ground to its better-known competitor and closed down in 2010.

Stripe 
Climbing Fast
The five-year-old payment processor, valued at $5 billion, has gotten a lift from such customers as Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and Kickstarter.

Lending Club
Up Up and Away
With its 2014 IPO, the online loan marketplace cemented its role as leader of this fintech generation.

Clinkle
Augering In
The mobile payments startup attracted buzz, and more than $30 million from high-profile investors, before pivoting products and hemorrhaging high-profile executives.

ZestFinance
Aiming High
ZestFinance, which sells pricey consumer loans to people who can't otherwise get credit, is expanding its data services to China--and is No. 192 on this year's Inc. 500 list, with $51 million in 2014 revenue.

Swift Capital
Gaining Momentum
The small-business financing company, which provides relatively costly but fast cash advances, is No. 64 on this year's Inc. 500 list, with $27.5 million in 2014 revenue.




Paul Smith 
QALA LATAM Partners
Associado ao Grupo Bozano
+55 21 98118-0300
Typos compliments of my iPad

Tech Trends 2014, Industrialized crowdsourcing - Deloitte University Press

Tech Trends 2014, Industrialized crowdsourcing - Deloitte University Press

Tech Trends 2014, Industrialized crowdsourcing

Some of the more compelling results come from harnessing the crowd via contests. These can be offered for entertainment or prestige by applying gamification techniques. Alternatively, top talent can be invited to compete on an assignment by offering financial incentives for the more effective responses. Sponsoring companies pay only for "winning" solutions while gaining access to a wide range of ideas. Talent has the freedom to select projects that match its interests and ambitions and is given a platform to showcase its work. Colgate Speed Stick used this model to spark a Super Bowl ad for the bargain-basement price of $17,000, compared with nine-figure investments associated with traditional agencies. Allstate sponsored a competition in which the crowd created a liability prediction model that was 271 percent more accurate than the original.

Leading companies are blasting through corporate walls with industrialized solutions to reach broader crowds capable of generating answers and executing tasks faster and more cost effectively than employees. Companies are also gaining access to niche, unproven experience that might be hard to find and retain in-house. And with the crowd, you pay only for the task being completed.

The crowd is waiting and willing. How will you put it to work?

Lessons from the front lines

Crowd wars: The "fan"tom menace

In 2013, Kellogg's Pringles teamed with Lucasfilm's Star Wars to launch "The Force for Fun Project," a Tongal-enabled contest challenging consumers and fans to design the next Pringles television commercial. By engaging a crowdsourcing platform, Pringles hoped to open its doors to access new ideas and inspire fresh, fan-driven digital content while generating millions of impressions.

The Force for Fun Project was staged in three rounds, with a bonus "wild card" round to identify additional finalists. First, fans were invited to submit a 140-character vision in the "ideas round." The top five ideas advanced to the "pitch round," where filmmakers could present a vision for a video production based on one of the five ideas. The winning pitches, as identified by Pringles and Star Wars executives, advanced to the final "video round," receiving a production budget to bring the pitch to life. In the final round, seven finalists were selected for a chance to win The Force for Fun Project grand prize, which included a $25,000 cash prize and a national television spot.

To drive additional buzz for the video finalists, Pringles and Star Wars solicited 10 die-hard fans and bloggers to feature the videos (with additional, behind-the-scenes content) on their own social platforms.

The six-month initiative generated over 1,000 idea submissions, 154 video pitches, over 1.5 million YouTube views, 6 million social impressions, and over 111 million overall impressions. Furthermore, the contest and winning videos received media coverage across mainstream media and digital outlets. On September 24, 2013, the winning commercial was broadcast to over 12 million viewers during ABC's series premiere of Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Civic crowdsourcing

As the budgets for civic organizations continue to shrink, municipalities, nonprofits, and other public organizations are reaching out to the public through crowdsourcing, which allows civic organizations to tap into their constituents for tools and services at a fraction of the cost of traditional sourcing approaches.

One example is the City of Chicago. After Mayor Rahm Emanuel signed an executive order making all non-private data available, the city sought ideas for providing the data to the public in a usable way. Targeting local software engineers, hobbyists, and "hackers,"the city initiated a crowdsourcing effort that yielded a number of app proposals, ranging from a 311 service tracker to a tool displaying real-time subway delays.

Another example is the Khan Academy, a nonprofit organization that provides free educational content online. It uses volunteers to translate the website into different languages—crowd-provided localization services. A Spanish site was released in September 2013, and videos have been translated into more than a dozen languages.

The City of Boston introduced the Citizens Connect mobile app in 2008, encouraging Bostonians to report problems ranging from broken streetlights to missed trash pickups. The reports are connected to the city maintenance tracking system, allowing work crews to be rapidly deployed to fix problems as reports come in and alerting citizens when work orders are resolved. Since the app debuted, the number of reports has risen from 8,000 in 2009 to more than 150,000 in 2012.

Have patents, will innovate

Product development and innovation can take years for large companies to develop from initial idea to an item available on retail shelves. Start-up company Quirky is challenging current wisdom by crowdsourcing the product development process, shortening the invention timeline of new products from years to weeks.

In 2012, Quirky caught the attention of GE when it launched 121 new products and sold 2.3 million units. The compressed development schedule impressed GE leadership so much that the company opened its patent library to the Quirky community to enable development of new consumer products.

Products developed by Quirky begin as one of approximately 3,000 ideas submitted weekly by the Quirky community. As ideas are submitted, community members vote for the ideas they like. Those with the most votes are reviewed by industry specialists and community members who select products for production. During development, the community influences the product roadmap by voting on issues ranging from color and price to engineering. With four products completed, the Quirky and GE team plan to release dozens more over the next five years, with GE already providing $30 million in funding.

Crowding store shelves

Innovation is likely at an all-time high in the consumer products industry. Traditionally, new initiatives and technologies took months, or even years, to implement. Today, the timeline can be weeks. Consumer product companies and retailers are finding benefits in rapid experimentation to keep up with the pace of change and stay on the leading edge of innovation.

A leading retailer chose to experiment with crowdsourcing to improve its data collection. It engaged with Gigwalk—a company that taps into the general population to perform micro-tasks for enterprises. Millions of "gigwalkers" use a mobile app that matches them with available jobs, or "gigs," based on their geographical area and skillset. Participants are then promptly paid for executing those tasks.

The company participated in a pilot program to investigate a hunch that stores were missing out on sales because of out-of-stock products. The company set up a series of gigs to monitor and collect data on the stocking of its stores' displays. It was hoping that by collecting and analyzing this data it could identify an opportunity to decrease lost sales.

The company wanted to use new technologies and techniques to tackle age-old industry challenges around out-of-stocks. It started by defining customer scenarios and identifying the specific data to be collected. The crowdsourced team would walk into more than a dozen stores twice a day and identify the missing products. A team member could scroll through a list of the company's products on the mobile app, click the ones that were missing, and use the drag-and-drop menu to enter product information.

The pilot went live a month after conception, but the first week yielded subpar results, with only a 21 percent task adoption rate among the available resources. So the company changed the way the gig was constructed and how the crowd would be incentivized. For example, it realized the term "SKU" was not well understood by many consumers; to aid comprehension, the company more clearly showcased the data that was to be collected. In addition, the company adjusted the pricing structure to reward "gigwalkers" for completing additional store audits. The new model also disclosed the goals and value of the company's crowdsourced data collection initiative. The changes proved to be powerful. In the second week the adoption rate was 84 percent, and in the third and fourth weeks, the rate rose to 99 percent.

The crowdsourcing experiment enabled the retailer to create datasets around its products. By creating a visual heat map, the company was able to view, store by store, which products were out of stock throughout a day across its stores in the pilot group. It was also able to improve the internal processes that corresponded to those products and reduce the number of out-of-stock items. The company estimated it could save millions of dollars if the piloted process enhancements were implemented in stores across the country. The retailer also created a geospatial map to identify routing issues that might be contributing to out-of-stock items, and was able to make changes to its distribution methodologies accordingly.

At a reasonable cost, and in a relatively short period, the company was able to use crowdsourcing to collect data; glean insights about its products, brands, and distribution; and improve processes to reduce its risk of lost sales.

My take

Salim Ismail, founding executive director and global ambassador, Singularity University

CIOs have one of the hardest roles in business today: They need to manage reliability, performance, and security while simultaneously guiding innovation and absorbing new technologies. Talent is a massively limiting factor—especially with regard to disruptive technologies like data science. Along with other techniques, crowdsourcing can offer a way to address these challenges.

I see two primary areas where companies can leverage the power of crowdsourcing. The first is in the micro-task world, where a company can create small pieces of work to outsource. The second is in the engagement world, where a company can use a crowdsourcing platform for a defined role such as software development. It's easier to do the latter, but as we atomize processes to smaller and smaller tasks, there is no reason those cannot also be outsourced. The dilemma emerges when you get to mission-critical processes. Outsourcing those can carry enormous risks, but it can also provide incredible scalability. I predict that in the next several years it will become more common, with startups leading the charge and larger organizations following suit to remain competitive. In information-based industries, this is likely to be crucial. Quirky, a consumer packaged goods (CPG) startup, manages a community of 500,000 inventors to submit ideas. Airbnb leverages the crowd to supply rooms for people to stay in.

DUP566_Crowdsourcing_960x550Regardless of which approach you take, I believe that crowdsourcing is here to stay. The number of people online is projected to increase from 2.4 billion today to 5 billion by 2020. These minds, armed with their ever-more-affordable tablets of choice, will dramatically increase the general availability of intellectual capital. And the technologies and resources now exist for virtually anyone to become skilled in anything very quickly. So the question becomes, "How will you adapt?"

The first step for the C-suite is to gain awareness: Many executives I talk to are unfamiliar with crowdsourcing. To CIOs who think, "That's interesting, but not for me," I would say that if you're only looking for innovation internally, you'll likely find yourself in trouble. There is too much happening outside your company walls for you to risk ignoring it, let alone not leveraging it. Consider the newspaper business, which was disrupted by Craigslist, or the music business, which was disrupted by the iTunes® application. Your business counterparts should expect that they will be disrupted even if they don't yet know in what way. For this reason, I urge traditional businesses to figure out how to cannibalize themselves, or someone else likely will. Yes, there is discomfort and risk involved, but that can be mitigated, and it is ultimately less dangerous than your business failing.

When you tap into the crowd, you sacrifice certainty for breadth of creative input, but as long as the crowd is large, you have the potential for incredible results at fractional costs. We're entering a world where businesses are either the disruptor or the disrupted, and there is no middle ground. I believe that taking advantage of trends like crowdsourcing can help companies keep the upper hand.

Where do you start?

Understanding how to use crowdsourcing to help reach organizational goals may not be intuitive, and the range of potential projects and platforms can add to the confusion, especially as you're educating your business counterparts. Data security, privacy, and compliance risks may be raised as roadblocks. That said, every industry can find acceptable areas in which to experiment, perhaps in unlikely places. Goldcorp is a mining company that shared its top-secret geological data with the crowd, offering $500,000 for finding six million ounces in untapped gold. This $500,000 investment yielded $3 billion in new gold in one year.

Tapping crowd power through an online platform is a low-risk investment with potentially high returns, but only if you choose appropriate projects.

Scope. Focus on a clear and specific problem to solve—one that can be boiled down to a question, task, or request with measurable definitions of success. One of the benefits of crowdsourcing comes from garnering ideas that aren't limited by your organization's preconceptions of how your business or market works. The scope of a task can require deep domain experience but should not be dependent on your own organization's context.

Focus on gaps in your organization's own abilities. Begin your search in areas where your own talent gaps have held back progress. What could you learn or accomplish if you had affordable manpower readily available? What complex problems have confounded your people? What solutions seem out of reach, no matter what you try? These may be problems worth pitching to a crowd that isn't contaminated by "what's not possible." Crowds are likely to consider data or information that insiders assume is irrelevant.

Keep an open mind. Crowdsourcing is rarely initially championed by a C-level executive, but the CIO may be in a position to help educate business leaders on its potential. A broad perspective across the enterprise, combined with an open mind, may help CIOs recognize unexpected applications that could benefit the organization. Leaders should foster a culture where appropriate crowd experiments are encouraged while minimizing security, privacy, and compliance risks. Employees may feel threatened by crowdsourcing, perceiving it either as a "big brother" tactic or a means to replace the existing workforce. Consider making crowdsourcing a tool for your employees.  For example, the sales team for a consumer goods company can use a crowdsourcing app to harness cheap labor to perform the mundane parts of their job. By letting your employees orchestrate the crowd, concerns can be alleviated.

Get ready for what's next. Crowdsourcing is in the early stages, but it's not too early to consider long-term opportunities for new ways to get work done. Could a native mobile app that feeds directly into your systems streamline field data collection and reporting in the future? Could the time come when it would make sense to provide access to corporate assets to free agents? A crowdsourced labor pool will become a legitimate component of many organizations' distributed workforce strategy. Start thinking now about what policies and processes need to be in place. Incentive structures, performance management, operating models, and delivery models may, in some cases, need to be redrawn. Use crowdsourcing as a tangible example of the shift to social business—allowing early experimentation to make the case for more profound investments and impacts.

Bottom line

Crowdsourcing is still in its early stages, but today's online platforms are sophisticated enough to provide substantial benefits in solving many kinds of problems. The potential for disruptive impact on cost alone makes early experimentation worthwhile. More important are the broader implications for innovation in the extended enterprise. Today you can expand your reach to engage talent to help with a wide range of needs. It's important that your organization has the ability to embrace new ideas that may be generated by your crowdsourcing initiatives. That means industrializing not just for scale and reach but also for outcome.




Paul Smith 
QALA LATAM Partners
Associado ao Grupo Bozano
+55 21 98118-0300
Typos compliments of my iPad

Cadia Startup Exchange | Cadia Startup Exchange and EECA at “Equity-based Crowdfunding: Economic and regulatory challenges ahead” seminar in Paris

Cadia Startup Exchange | Cadia Startup Exchange and EECA at "Equity-based Crowdfunding: Economic and regulatory challenges ahead" seminar in Paris

Cadia Startup Exchange and EECA at "Equity-based Crowdfunding: Economic and regulatory challenges ahead" seminar in Paris

Cadia Startup Exchange is invited to participate in the seminar "Equity-based Crowdfunding: Economic and regulatory challenges ahead" on September 28 2015 in Paris. European Institute of Financial Regulation (EIFR) are the organizers of the seminar and they aim to join the forces of industry leaders to lay the foundation of a unified European Framework for equity-based crowdfunding. Cadia Startup Exchange is one of the founding members of the European Equity Crowdfunding Association (EECA) and the only one to have integrated a fully-automated secondary market on its platform.  

The seminar is hosted by leading EU regulatory organs and crowdfunding platforms and associations thus most interested in attending the event are crowdfunding platforms and financial intermediaries for SMEs as well as banks (retail and SME business centers). On the other side are business angels, capital risk and investment funds who have the opportunity to understand the latest trends in European equity crowdfunding amendments. Private banking and financial advisors, incubators and regulatory organs, SME policy makers and stakeholders are welcome to join seminar "Equity-based Crowdfunding: Economic and regulatory challenges ahead".

The need of a unified regulatory system has been consistently raising since over 300 platforms have appeared in Europe, with a vast variety of different business models. To enable SMEs to access the fundings they need, to protect appropriately investors (retail and more recently institutional ones) and ensure an effective level playing field in Europe, European and national regulators and supervisors must apprehend risks induced by on-line distribution channels and by the specificities of diverse alternative funding schemes (250+ platforms in Europe / 50+ in France), EIFR initiated that meeting.

Different issues need to be addressed to ensure efficient funding of SMEs and investor protection from an equity-based crowdfunding perspective: regulatory frame (MIFID/CRR), information disclosure, secondary market, etc. Since the crowdfunding market is exponentially growing reaching 3 € billion in 2014 it's of uttermost importance to establish an equal regulation system for the variety of business models.

The event will take place in Paris, France on September 28 2015 (Monday) at Salon Etoile St-Honoré situated at 214 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, 75008 Paris, France. Attendees are required to make a contribution of €400 and register their attendance on EIFR's website: Register Here

The managing Director of EIFR, Edouard-François de LENCQUESAING opens the seminar at 8.30 am. One of the first objectives of the event is to report on the progress in creating a unified European Framework. Guest speaker on the topic is Barbara Gabor who is a Policy officer at the European Commission. She will stress out on EU crowdfunding regulations as well as reporting on progress and revealing the contributions of Crowdfunding expert groups. In the second module François-Régis BENOIS will speak about the concerns of the Regulators about Equity Crowdfunding and will discuss the French network in more details.

At 10:30am EECA along with representatives of the largest European equity-based crowdfunding platforms will open up a discussion on the development of the European Crowdfunding Market with detailed information on country market shares. Questions and concerns about the strategic and business challenges in front of the platforms will also be shared with the audience. Full program for the seminar can be found here: Seminar Program

Do not miss the chance to take an active part in the change and join now!

For more information contact EIFR at contact@eifr.eu




Paul Smith 
QALA LATAM Partners
Associado ao Grupo Bozano
+55 21 98118-0300
Typos compliments of my iPad

quarta-feira, agosto 12, 2015

Deep Web: o que se esconde no submundo da internet

Salvar notícia

iStock

Relatório "Abaixo da superfície: exploração da Deep Web" revelou que mais de 25% das buscas na Deep Web são voltadas para exploração infantil e pornografia

Da EFE

A internet profunda, ou "Deep Web", esse enorme espaço virtual que foge ao controle da Justiça convencional e que seria 400 vezes maior do que a internet comum, esconde um mundo de atividades criminosas que buscam anonimato, enquanto aumentam as práticas ilícitas.

Recentemente divulgado, um relatório da Trend Micro intitulado "Abaixo da superfície: exploração da Deep Web" revelou que mais de 25% das buscas entre a Deep Web e a internet padrão são com fins de exploração infantil e pornografia.

Outro dado destacado pela empresa especializada em segurança online é o preço de US$ 180 mil cobrado por esses sites secretos para assassinar uma personalidade ou político.

Para obter informações desta rede inacessível através de navegadores comuns, como o Chrome e o Internet Explorer, e aparentemente invencível, a equipe da Trend Micro utilizou um sistema chamado Analisador de Deep Web (DeWa).

O DeWa reúne as URLs ligadas à "Dark Web", a pior parte da "Deep Web", incluindo Tor, sites I2P (Invisible Internet Project) e os identificadores de recursos Freenet, para extrair dados relevantes vinculados a eles, como conteúdo, links e endereço de e-mail.

Este sistema também alerta sobre o aumento do tráfego de informação e seus sites, algo especialmente útil quando se buscam novas famílias de "malware", os softwares maliciosos destinados a invadir um sistema de computador alheio de forma ilícita.

As drogas brandas, especialmente maconha, são a mercadoria mais vendida neste ambiente online, que não é encontrado em buscadores tradicionais como o Google.

Ao todo, 32% dos itens comercializados nas 15 maiores lojas da "Deep Web" têm relação com a cannabis. Em seguida aparecem produtos como Ritalina e Xanax, mais conhecido como Alprazolam, medicamentos pesados e de venda controlada.

Nessa terra sem lei, também é possível conseguir a cidadania americana. Sites especializados criam passaportes por US$ 5.900 (R$ 20.390).

A compra de uma conta roubada do eBay ou do PayPal em uma das lojas do submundo online custa US$ 110 (R$ 380). De acordo com o relatório, 34% das URLs ou endereços eletrônicos que contêm "malware" na internet do usuário comum têm conexões com a internet profunda.

O analista David Sancho, pesquisador da Trend Micro na área de "Deep Web", explicou à Agência Efe que, quando se fala do volume de atividade nesse mundo cada vez "mais popular" não se leva em conta apenas o total de páginas hospedadas, mas também o número de serviços ocultos. Eles podem disseminar informação ilegal ou proibida, como terrorismo e atividades da máfia, além de comercializar armas.

Segundo o relatório, a maior parte disparada das URLs da "Deep Web" está em russo (41.40%) e inglês (40.74%). Em português, há 1,25% das páginas.

 

quarta-feira, agosto 05, 2015

Brazil: Equity crowdfunding as a catalyst for development in emerging economies

[Equity Crowdfunding as a Catalyst for Development in Emerging Economies]
© Image: Shutterstock / Frederic Muller<http://www.shutterstock.com/>
EDITORIAL
EQUITY CROWDFUNDING AS A CATALYST FOR DEVELOPMENT IN EMERGING ECONOMIES

Editor's Note: The following is a guest post from Greg Kelly, founder and CEO of the new Brazilian equity crowdfunding platform EqSeed<https://eqseed.com/br>. Kelly discusses the equity crowdfunding space in Brazil, obstacles to growth, and the promising regulatory landscape in the country. You can follow the company's latest developments @eqseed<https://twitter.com/eqseed>. As always, guest contributors' views are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Crowdsourcing.org.

Almost five years since its inception in the UK in the midst of the global financial crisis, equity crowdfunding continues to develop towards mainstream investment status in leading developed economies.

The market is currently dominated by the UK, where volumes invested in early stage companies via online platforms reached around £85 million ($132 million) in 2014. Additionally, with the SEC having finally moved to allow non-accredited investors to participate in equity crowdfunding via Reg. A+, an influx of capital from the US is set to make a huge impact on equity crowdfunding in the coming years.

Alongside this success, equity crowdfunding is also finding its way to emerging economies. One such market is Brazil, where I am the founder of EqSeed, a new platform bringing equity crowdfunding to South America's largest economy. Applying this new financial innovation in developing economies presents myriad new challenges. Perhaps the most prominent one stems from the fact that, unlike the developed economies in which equity crowdfunding is currently thriving, emerging market countries do not tend to have a strong culture of equity investment.

Whilst the correlation between the world's most innovative and successful economies and the strength of their equity and long-term investment culture is too strong to be ignored, the catalysts for the lack of a long-term investment culture in emerging markets are equally powerful.

In Brazil, a focus on the short-term is prominent throughout society, visible all the way from government interventionist policy to local investors' expectations on short-term returns and liquidity over real rates of return and long-term capital gains. This culture is heavily influenced by the experience of painful economic events in recent decades that have not been limited to the economic disarray of hyperinflation, bank account deposit seizures, and corruption scandals. Brazilians have lived with and adapted to five different currencies since the mid-1980´s, before the introduction of the relatively stable Real in 1994. These traumatic economic experiences erode trust in institutions, governments and economics and in turn have a similarly profound negative effect on investment levels. The distrust is well-founded, obviously justifiable, and deeply embedded, and as such presents a great challenge in the development of emerging economies.

A NEW FRONTIER

Against this backdrop, equity crowdfunding finds itself in a new environment and with a very different type of challenge to overcome. Instead of being a modern twist on a fairly traditional alternative asset class in developed markets, equity crowdfunding can instead be the driver of a simplified, localized equity investment culture.

With this potential comes huge responsibilities for this still nascent market, especially in terms of transparency and corporate governance. Promoting and embedding best practices - not always observed to great effect by even the largest corporations - will require highly professional platforms with experienced teams, well-structured investment transactions and complete due diligence procedures. Platforms also have to take responsibility to provide the tools and education that will allow this crowdsourced model to grow responsibly within this new environment.

The foundations are already in place in Brazil with the formation of the industry organization EQUITY - Associação Brasileira de Equity Crowdfunding<https://www.facebook.com/associacaoequitycrowdfunding>. The association looks to apply the Brazilian standards of self-regulation to achieve the delegation of powers of supervision of the market. The local regulator, the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) recently announced the publication of a public consultation on the subject of equity crowdfunding to be held later in 2015, before the introduction of a specific regulatory framework in 2016. If the CVM successfully delivers regulation that facilitates the development of a responsible market whilst protecting smaller investors, the future may look bright for equity crowdfunding in Brazil.

If the equity crowdfunding market in emerging economies can develop successfully, the opportunities to support economic growth and development are enormous. Equity crowdfunding in emerging markets could lead to a grass roots equity ownership revolution that drives economic development from the base up by facilitating the growth and development of a new breed of innovate companies that can go on to become genuine global market contenders.

The equity crowdfunding sector cannot achieve this alone of course, and there is still an experience, knowledge and education gap that must be addressed over the short, medium, and long term by policy makers and government. The same must be said for the existing legal structures that do not always protect investors and therefore restrict risk capital investment. Similarly, tax incentives for investment in small companies, akin to the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) and the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) employed so successfully in the UK, would drive a huge increase in the numbers of ordinary investors attracted to the asset class.

AND A PROMISING FUTURE

Despite the challenges, the potential for equity crowdfunding to play a prominent role in the development of emerging economies is incredibly exciting. The future of equity crowdfunding is, in my opinion, certain to be global. There are complexities to overcome, but this investment tool has the power to facilitate cross border investment into emerging markets at the level where it can be most effective: supporting the transformation of today's seed stage companies into tomorrow's market leaders.

To play an integral part in this global future, emerging markets will first need to develop responsible, transparent local markets that can later be augmented by global capital. I hope that we at EqSeed can play an integral part in making that a reality here in Brazil and watch with huge interest as other such platforms look to do the same in other emerging economies.

Greg Kelly is the CEO and founder of EqSeed, a Brazilian equity crowdfunding platform based in Rio de Janeiro. He is also a Director of Equity - Associação Brasileira de Equity Crowdfunding. He is a former structured finance banker with Lloyds Bank in London and holds an Associate Chartered Banker Diploma from The Chartered Banker Institute.
Tags: brasil crowdfunding<http://www.crowdsourcing.org/navigate-search?q=brasil%20crowdfunding>, crowd funding<http://www.crowdsourcing.org/navigate-search?q=crowd%20funding>, Crowdfunding<http://www.crowdsourcing.org/navigate-search?q=Crowdfunding>, crowdfunding brazil<http://www.crowdsourcing.org/navigate-search?q=crowdfunding%20brazil>
[Crowdsourcing.org]Posted by Crowdsourcing.org<http://www.crowdsourcing.org/profile/crowdsourcingorg/2030>
Jul 31, 2015 12:47 pm GMTViewed 1286 times
Author: Crowdsourcing.org<http://www.crowdsourcing.org/profile/crowdsourcingorg/2030>